Miscellaneous - Aaron Torres Sports
|
Written by Aaron Torres
|
|
Wednesday, 25 August 2010 08:44 |
|
I've got a little secret to confess: I actually like the show Entourage.
Call me crazy. It's ok, sometimes I think I am. Especially after gritting my teeth through another unbearable episode every Sunday night. The show has become a car crashed mixed with one of those really bad American Idol audtions, painful on your eyes and ears, but you just...can't...look...away.
This season has been no different.
Eric has officially turned into Billy Walsh's prophecy: A walking, talking "suit," working for the man, and sipping chardonnay with his fiancee, all while they plan their wedding (Good times. I just hope he turned his penis in to the proper authorities). Turtle's turned every episode into a Dos Equis commercial, and pushed tequila on the American consumer the way a 30-year-old, first time mom pushes pictures of her newborn on unsuspecting friends. And Drama? Well that dude is just pushing 50.
Finally there's Vince, who has slowly but surely become less likeable than Brett Favre throwing football's to high school kids in Mississippi. Which is no small feat. He's dating a porn star, doing drugs and throwing his life away. There may not be a less likeable character on TV.
But as I watched this weekend's past episode, I couldn't help but notice something. How the alcohol/drug/womanizing downfall that Vince is in the middle of, looks eerily familiar. Then I realized where I'd seen it before: This past year with Tiger Woods. A guy who just so happens to be back in the news after finalizing his divorce with Elin on Monday.
After catching a replay of Entourage again last night (again, I don't know why I watched, I guess I'm a masochist) I really started to wonder, who's had a worse year, Tiger Woods or Vinnie Chase?
Let's investigate.
|
|
Written by Aaron Torres
|
|
Tuesday, 17 August 2010 07:25 |
Over the weekend I was laying by the pool, taking in some rays and listening to my iPod shuffle, when, after a steady stream of calming, relaxing music, the Colin Cowherd podcast popped up out of nowhere. So much for relaxing, huh?
I'm sure most of you are familiar with Cowherd's work, but for those who aren't, Cowherd definitely knows how to get a debate going. He's equal parts stubborn and contrarian, but never ends a rant without making you think about something differently than you might have previously. Even if you want to strangle him sometimes.
The particular debate Colin had on this day, was whether or not it's acceptable for adults to wear team jerseys, and at what age the act goes from "upbeat fan supporting the team," to "weird old guy who needs to get a life."
While a consensus was never officially agreed upon, it got me thinking: How have the rules of being a sports fan changed over time, and what are they in 2010?
Here's my take on 10 of them.
|
|
Written by Aaron Torres
|
|
Friday, 06 August 2010 11:38 |
We all know sports aren't perfect.
Baseball games are too long. College football needs a playoff. The NHL- for some inexplicable reason- still has a team in Phoenix. ESPN continues to show WNBA games.
But what really needs fixing?
Here's a list of a few ways on How I'd Change Sports...
|
|
Written by Aaron Torres
|
|
Friday, 30 July 2010 09:34 |
|
There's a gre at scene in the movie Major League II, where Roger Dorn looks Jake Taylor in the eye, and says, "Did you ever feel like you were just born for greatness?"
While I can't say I have, I do know greatness when I see it: Roger Federer. Pre-sex scandal Tiger Woods. Ken Griffey Jr., before his body broke down like a used car. And of course Snooki, the Situation and Pauly D and the rest of the Jersey Shore cast.
That's right, Jersey Shore kicked off it's second season last night, and I'm here to give you a recap.
But rather than just doing a regular review, I'll let the guys put it into their own words. Here is a running diary (Yes I ripped this gimmick off from a million writers before me) of the events, as they transpired.
Let's pick things just minutes before the premeire...
|
|
Written by Aaron Torres
|
|
Wednesday, 28 July 2010 12:33 |
A few weeks ago I heard that James Gammon, the man who played manager Lou Brown in the Major League movies had died. Needless to say, I had mixed emotions.
On the one hand, you obviously never want to hear of anyone passing. And it's always especially saddening when the deceased might not be someone you know, but feel like you do, like Gammon, the no-nonsense guy's guy I remembered from the Cleveland Indians dugout. Even if I never met him, Gammon always seemed like a cooler, older guy you'd love to have a beer with.
At the same though, thinking back on Major League and Major League II brought back a lot of good memories. Like watching the original so many times with my parents that our old VHS tape eventually wore out. Or watching the sequel with my buddies in college dozens of times, and re-hashing lines like they were our own (For example, whenever one of our friends would get into an argument with his girlfriend, we'd always console him by quoting Rube Baker: "Women, you can't live without them, and they can't pee standing up." Thanks Rube!).
As time has worn on though, a new debate amongst friends and family has come about: Why is actually better? Some think the high jinks of Major League II take away from the baseball that made Major League so great. Others are too busy laughing at the second to even think about the first. Some are torn.
Well, in honor of Gammon's passing, I've decided to go ahead and settle this debate once and for all.
Over the last week, I have re-watched each for the first time in years, and took copious notes along the way. All so that you, the reader, have the definitive answer to the Great Debate: Which is better, Major League or Major League II?
|
|
Written by Aaron Torres
|
|
Thursday, 08 July 2010 08:43 |
Like most of you, coming into this summer’s World Cup, I wasn’t quite sure what to expect.
Would I watch? Of course I would, if only because it’s my job to have an opinion on it. But would I care? That remained to be seen.
Well, here we are, now almost a full month after the start of play back on June 11, and I’ve got a confession to make: I’m a World Cup junkie.
I Google funny names and countries I’m not familiar with. I have conversations with my buddies that center around stuff like, “Is it just me, or does Andres Iniesta not look right tonight?” I’m even to the point where I can spell names like Bastian Schweinsteiger and Asamoah Gyan without looking them up, or looking down at my keyboard as I type.
What can I say, I love the World Cup.
It’s the only sporting event I know of- and correct me if I’m wrong- that combines the best players in the world in their sport, with seemingly life and death consequences, all to the backdrop of singing and dancing, with half the teams wearing goofy mismatched colors. Essentially, it’s what the World Series would be, if it was really was the World Series, rather than what it actually is, the American Baseball Championship.
Either way, with the Netherlands and Spain getting set for the final on Sunday, I did some reflecting. Here are 10 things I’ll remember from this World Cup.
|
|
Written by Aaron Torres
|
|
Sunday, 04 July 2010 08:20 |
It's July 4th. A day to be thankful for our freedoms. A day to be thankful for our independence. A day to sit on the beach, drink cold beer, get your burn on, and oogle girls who may or may not be of legal age.
So while we'll get back to sports bigger issues later in the week, it's time to just sit back, relax and appreciate everything. Including sports.
Come to think of it, here are a few reasons why I love them.
|
|
Written by Aaron Torres
|
|
Monday, 28 June 2010 12:08 |
As weird as this may sound, my thoughts on Saturday’s United States World Cup loss actually date back over a year.
At the time, I was working with a baseball team in Alaska, doing some broadcasting and website stuff during the day, and trying to enjoy the outdoors and 24 hours of sunlight in my down time. Meanwhile back in the lower 48, everyone was getting caught up with soccer, as our American boys made an unexpected run at the Confederations Cup.
First we advanced out of group play. Then there was victory over the top ranked African side, Egypt in the quarterfinals. Next was the shocker of all shockers, our Yanks, the Americans, defeating world super-power and defending Euro Cup champions Spain. By the time the U.S. got to the final against Brazil, the whole country came down with soccer fever, and not even a 3-2 loss dampened anyone’s spirits. Before the final whistle even blew in the Confederations Cup, everyone had already turned their attention to the World Cup in 2010. On the field America would be ready. Off it, the fans believed we would support our squad with a passion similar to our European and South American friends. That the U.S. was finally ready to be a “soccer country.”
Me, I wasn’t so sure.
|
|
Written by Aaron Torres
|
|
Friday, 28 May 2010 08:29 |
To some of you regular readers, I know you think of me as some crazed, bizarre, sports lunatic. A guy who falls asleep with West Coast baseball games on, and wakes up to replays of Sportscenter in the morning. A guy who watches classic college football games for "fun," reads passages from old Sports Illustrated's when he's bored, and even flips on the India-Pakistan cricket match when there's nothing else on TV. Well, with the exception of the cricket, you'd be right (Ok, ok, I watched cricket, but it was just ONE time. I swear!).
However, beyond that though, I'm a relatively normal guy, that does the same stuff everybody does. I go to the mall and hang out with my buddies. I play pick-up basketball and hit the driving range every once in awhile. And despite what internet rumors might be out there, yes I even put my pants on one leg at a time. Even if it took me until I was eight to totally figure out how.
Anyway, being a sportswriter, I'm sure many of you assume that I spent this past Monday watching either Game 4 of the Magic-Celtics series, or the opener of a three game Red Sox sweep of the first place Rays. Actually though, I was doing my normal guy routine at a birthday party.
Now before we go any further, I know what you're thinking, and no this wasn't one of those "Brody Jenner on The Hills," type birthday parties, I promise. There were no crazy antics or binge drinking, and truthfully, there weren't even presents exchanged.
Why no presents?
Well, I was at my grandma's 94th birthday party, and honestly, what do you get a 94-year-old that has it all? A Nintendo Wii?
|
|
Written by Aaron Torres
|
|
Friday, 14 May 2010 08:32 |
|
Considering that I'm not between the ages of 72 and dead, horse racing has never really piqued my interested as a sports fan. Sure, I'd flip on a Kentucky Derby here or there, check out the Belmont if someone was going for the Triple Crown, and yes, I did send flowers and a hand-written card to Barbaro a few years ago, but that's it. (Ok, I definitely made that last part up. You caught me)
So when my buddy asked me in the spring of 2007 to go to the Preakness Stakes with him, I was hestitant. I mean, when I thought about going to a big horse race, I just pictured lots of stuffy people in big hats and ugly suits, and old men smoking cigars sitting next to "wives," half their age. Not to mention horses running around in circles. Consider me uninterested.
But over the next few weeks, my buddy persisted: "Come on AT. My uncle went a few years ago and said it was one of the best days of his life. Said you won't even see a horse the entire time you're there." Whatever that meant.
Still, sitting in a medal chair next to some 40-year-old woman in pearls, betting money I didn't have, on horses I didn't care about, just wasn't appealing.
Finally, after weeks of pressure, I relented. At least, "Attending a Triple Crown horse race," was something I could cross of my sports bucket list (Even though at the time, the term "Bucket List," hadn't been invented. But still).
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 1 of 4 |
|
|